New file hosts?

[Sasho]

Maybe is better to stop that allowed sites to use.People will choose what they want.Only regulation should be not to post with paying hosting sites.So think that will be good.Everyone have favorite site for different reason.

 

[antispamer]

If I stop publishing, who will be better off?

 

[Sasho]

Well.allow people to choose hosting sites,i don't see any benefit for not allowing,for example suprafiles.I'm working with them almost year,they pay me more than 300 $ so,what's the problem.They don't have too much pop up,they pay for few days waiting,so...

 

[^^GoRiLLaZ^^]

Guys what about filefox.cc? Allowed or not?

 

[filmcool]

takefile.link ????

takefile.link


enable this file sharing - it’s normal, normally counts domain sales - you will have a profit

 

[tangil]

dear admin, file hosts turbobit.net?

 

[sickman]

Should we allow some new file hosts to be used as single hosts? These have been suggested:

Hotlink.cc, DepFile, File.al, ZippyShare
http://flexydrive.com
https://openload.co/
https://userscloud.com/
https://filefox.cc/
https://uploadocean.com
https://ausfile.com/
https://katfile.com/
https://subyshare.com/
https://uploadocean.com/

You find the list of recommended/mandatory hosts here.

Filefactory and uploaded?

 

[Mozambique]

subyshare is good

 

[Ice Zero]

Please allow filebonus.net. My files have been without problems for over a year. They also pay up to 10% to webmasters.

 

[vaper]

filefox is same owners as filejoker

so if you allow filejoker, why not filefox?